<Limit> configuration sections allow for
powerful fine-grained control over who is allowed to use which FTP commands.
This power comes at the price of complexity, however. This document
describes some of the things to keep in mind when writing
Perhaps the hardest part of using
<Limit> is understanding
its rules of precedence, which dictate which
restrictions apply when. Precedence is discussed in the directive
documentation, and will be mentioned here. First, there are three types
of parameters in a
<Limit> directive: "raw"
FTP commands, FTP command groups, and the
"Raw" FTP commands are listed here, including
the RFC-mandated X-variant FTP commands, which are
often missing from a thorough
The FTP command groups are:
<Limit>s that use "raw" FTP commands have
the highest precedence, followed by
<Limit>s that use
the command groups, and, having the lowest precedence, the
keyword. If a
<Limit> has both "raw" commands
and command groups, then it boils down to the order of appearance of
<Limit> sections in
use the "raw" command in question.
To apply a
<Limit> to a
SITE command, combine
"SITE" and the command (e.g. "CHMOD") by an
underscore ("_"), like so:
<Limit SITE_command>Thus, in order to place a limit on
SITE CHMOD, one would have:
<Limit SITE_CHMOD> DenyAll </Limit>
<Limit> sections appear within
<Directory> sections in
means that, like the other
<Limit>s will be inherited by all subdirectories
that appear in the
<Directory> path, unless explicitly
overridden by a "closer"
This means that one could configure a
denying all FTP commands for all directories, and then explicitly allow
WRITE FTP command groups in appropriate
There is a catch to using the
AllowUser configuration directive
that causes confusion, primarily when a single
directive is being used to allow access to some FTP commands only to
certain users. ProFTPD uses the same function for parsing the
AllowGroup (and other) directives.
This function parses the list of names for such directives as a
Boolean AND list, which means that each name on the list must evaluate to
TRUE (must match) for the current user in order for the directive to apply.
AllowGroup, this makes sense, and allows a great deal
of flexibility. However, it does not make sense for
because a user may not be multiple users at the same time. This is a known
issue, and a proper, thorough solution is being developed. In the meantime,
however, there is a workaround for allowing multiple users via the
AllowUser directive. Rather than listing the users using
AllowUser, using a separate
for each user. For example, instead of:
AllowUser bob,dave,wendytry using:
AllowUser bob AllowUser dave AllowUser wendyAll of this applies to the
DenyUserdirective as well.
Another important item to keep in mind is that the names used in
<Limit> sections, e.g. using
are not resolved to an ID and then applied; the limits are applied
only to the names. Why is this important? Consider the case where the site
is using virtual users, where two different user names are assigned the
same UID. Different limits can be applied to each name separately. Do not
assume that the limits are applied to the underlying IDs.
One thing that sometimes trips up some administrators is the difference between ProFTPD's and Apache's
Order configuration directives.
For Apache, an
Order of "Allow,Deny" means that
access is denied by default, unless an
explicitly allows access; an
Order of "Deny,Allow"
means that access is allowed by default, unless a
directive explicitly denies access. This is different from ProFTPD, where
Order of "Allow,Deny" allows access by
default, unless denied by a
Deny directive; "Deny,Allow"
denies access by default, unless explicitly granted by an
Allow directive. The developers of ProFTPD felt their
interpretation to be the more "common sense" interpretation, even
though it does not match Apache's interpretation.
Here are examples to help illustrate the use of
First, a common configuration: an upload-only directory.
<Directory /path/to/uploads> <Limit ALL> DenyAll </Limit> <Limit CDUP CWD PWD XCWD XCUP> AllowAll </Limit> <Limit STOR STOU> AllowAll </Limit> </Directory>The first
<Limit ALL>section blocks use of all FTP commands within the
/path/to/uploadsdirectory. Having denied use of all commands, we then proceed to define which commands can be used. The
CWDcommands (and their X variants) should be allowed so that clients can change into and out of the directory. Next,
STOUare allowed, so that clients can actually upload files into the directory (assuming that the filesystem permissions allow for the client to write files in the directory as well). The
WRITEcommand group might have been used, but that also allows things like creating and deleting subdirectories, which is usually not wanted in an upload-only configuration.
This next example shows a "blind" directory, where clients can upload and download files from the directory, but they cannot see what is in the directory:
<Directory /path/to/dir> <Limit LIST NLST MLSD MLST STAT> DenyAll </Limit> </Directory>That's it. By default, all commands are allowed in a directory. By blocking the FTP commands used to list a directory's contents (i.e.
NLST), we have effectively blocked the client from seeing anything in the directory. Not many clients use the
STATcommand, but it also needs to be limited, as it can return information about files in a directory as well.
Cautious system administrators may want only a few select system users to be
able to connect to their
proftpd server--all other users are
to be denied access. The
LOGIN command group is designed for
just this scenario:
<Limit LOGIN> AllowUser barb AllowUser dave AllowGroup ftpuser DenyAll </Limit>This allows the users
dave, as well as any user in the
ftpusergroup, to login. All other users will be denied.
What if a site wished to allow only anonymous access? This would be
configured using the
LOGIN command group, as above:
<Limit LOGIN> DenyAll </Limit> <Anonymous ~ftp> <Limit LOGIN> AllowAll </Limit> ... </Anonymous>The
<Limit>section outside of the
<Anonymous>section denies logins to everyone. However, the
<Anonymous>section has a
<Limit>that allows everyone to login; anonymous logins are allowed, and non-anonymous logins are denied.
Another related question often asked is "How can I limit a user to only
being able to login from a specific range of IP addresses?" The
<Limit LOGIN> can be used, in conjunction with the
mod_ifsession module and a
Class, to configure this:
<Class friends> From 126.96.36.199/8 </Class> <IfUser dave> <Limit LOGIN> AllowClass friends DenyAll </Limit> </IfUser>
Or if you want to have a specific IP address, rather than a range, you can
do this without classes (but still requiring
<IfUser dave> <Limit LOGIN> Deny from 188.8.131.52 </Limit> </IfUser>Note that the same effect can be achieved by using the mod_wrap2 module to configure user-specific allow/deny files.
One issue that you should avoid is having multiple different
<Limit LOGIN> sections in your config
for the same vhost. Consider a config like this:
<VirtualHost 184.108.40.206> ... <Limit LOGIN> Order allow, deny Allow from 192.168.0.0/16 DenyAll </Limit> ... <Limit LOGIN> Order deny, allow Deny from 192.168.0.0/16 </Limit> ... </VirtualHost>The two
<Limit LOGIN>sections conflict; which one will
proftpdactually use for deciding whether to allow a connection to that
<VirtualHost>? Answer: the last
<Limit LOGIN>section defined. To avoid confusion, then, it is best to consolidate all of your
<Limit LOGIN>rules into a single section for a given vhost.
In Apache, it is possible to configure password-protected directories.
Some sysadmins attempt to configure
proftpd similarly, by
unsuccessfully attempting something like this in the
<Directory /some/path> <Limit LOGIN> DenyUser foo </Limit> </Directory>The above will not work. FTP clients (unlike HTTP clients) login to the server, not into specific directories.
One situation that often arises is one where the administrator would like to give users the ability to upload and dowload files from a given directory, but not to be able to delete files from that directory. This cannot be accomplished using normal Unix filesystem permissions, for if a user has write permission on a directory (necessary for uploading files to that directory) they also have delete permissions. In Unix, a directory file serves as a sort of "table of contents", tracking the files in the directory. Adding or removing a file are thus changes on the directory file, and do not involve checking the permissions on the file being added or removed. This is also how a non-root user can delete files that are owned by root and only have user-write permissions. So how then can a site be configured to allow writes but not deletes? By using a configuration similar to the following:
<Directory /path/to/dir> <Limit DELE> AllowUser ftpadm DenyAll </Limit> </Directory>This will allow the user
ftpadmto delete files in the
/path/to/dir, but no other users.
The FTP protocol has two types of data transfers: active and passive. In
some configurations, only one type of transfer is allowed by the network
(e.g. active transfers should be denied because clients are sending
the wrong IP addresses). The ability to place a
on the FTP commands response for active and passive data transfers was
added to ProFTPD in 1.2.10rc1. If you are using that version or later,
you can use the following to block active transfers:
<Limit EPRT PORT> DenyAll </Limit>Or, conversely, to block passive data transfers:
<Limit EPSV PASV> DenyAll </Limit>
Another common question is: "How can I create a read-only account using
<Limit> sections"? Here's how:
# Assumes that the user is chrooted into their home directory <Directory ~user> <Limit CWD PWD DIRS READ> AllowUser user </Limit> <Limit ALL> DenyUser user </Limit> </Directory>
What if you want to prevent a certain directory from being deleted, but
you do want to allow sub-directories in that directory to be deletable?
<Directory> sections with
<Limit> sections, you can do this, e.g.:
<Directory /path/to/dir> <Limit RMD XRMD> DenyAll </Limit> </Directory> <Directory /path/to/dir/*> <Limit RMD XRMD> AllowAll </Limit< >/Directory>Note the trailing "/*" suffix in the second
<Directory>section; this means that the second
<Directory>section configuration applies to the sub-directories, but not to the parent directory itself (which is covered by the first
What if you want to make sure the directory cannot be renamed, in addition to
ensuring that it cannot be deleted? Simply include the
RNTO FTP commands in the list of denied commands, e.g.:
<Directory /path/to/dir> <Limit RMD RNFR RNTO XRMD> DenyAll </Limit> </Directory>